A new
Cichlid from lake Tanganyika:
Julidochromis dickfeldi sp. N. (Staeck 1975).
(Pisces, cichlidae)
The new cichlid fish of the genus Julidochromis, described in the following
account was collected in January 1975 during the course of a study on the
fishes of the Zambian part of lake Tanganyika, undertaken by a group of
German ichthyologists and aquarists in the region of Sumbu national park.
Although a total of specimens were collected, the number of fishes available
for mesuration was very small, as twelve of them were carried alive to
Europe. The rest, which died shortly after the capture, were for the most
part in such bad condition that they could not be used for the description,
which is consequently based only on tow specimens of 65,9 (holotype) and
62,4 mm (paratype) in standard length. The holotype and paratype (figures in
brackets) are deposited in the collection of muse royal de l’afrique
centrale at Tervuren (reg. Nos 75-23-P-1 and 2).
DESCRIPTION
Maximum depth of body 4,61 (4,52) times, length of head 3,56 (3,23) times in
the standard length. Body elongated, 1,18 (1,33) times as deep as broad.
Head 1,78 (2,03) as long as broad, with convex upper profile; snout 2,58
(2,38) times in length of head and 1,51 (1,93) times as long as the diameter
of the eye, which is 4,30 (4,60) times in length of head and 1,58 (1,48)
times in interorbital width. Interorbital width 2,72 and 1,58 (1,48) times
in interorbital width. Interorbital width 2,72 (3,11) times in length of
head.
Mouth narrow, extending to below nostril. Lower jaw 4,20 (6,23) times in the
length of head and much shorter than upper jaw. Teeth very small, conical,
forming a villiforme band in each jaw with
Canines in front, the outer of witch are large and strongly curved. Gills
rakers short, four on lower part of anterior arch. Dorsal XXIV 5; soft rays
longer than spines; longest spine 2,01 (2,22), longest soft ray 1,65 (2,12)
times in length of head. First spine very short.
(… …)
Pectoral 1,46 (1,69) times in length of head 5,19 (5,47) times in standard
length. Ventral extended into a filament, reaching or passing the origin of
anal. Caudal rounded. Caudal peduncle 1,69 (1,71) times as long as deep.
Anal papilla short, not exceeding 1 mm in length.
(… …)
Scales ctenoid, very small on nape, thorax, and anterior part of the back.
Operculum and pre-operculum partly covered with very small scales.
Total length of holotype 76,5 mm (paratype 70,7 mm). Largest know size 85 mm
in total length.
As there are only two preserved specimens of species, it was not thought
advisable to make an examination of the internal characteristics.
COLOUR
General body colour brown, in the lower half of the sides frequently with a
bluish or sooty sheen. Lower half of head fawn. On the snout and occiput
several irregular black cross bars and spots. With three black longitudinal
stripes on each side of the body. One from the end of the snout to the base
of caudal, a second from the upper margin of the eye to the upper edge of
caudal, a third along the base of dorsal fin.
On the cheeks and between the eye and the posterior rim of the operculum the
lowermost of these stripes is edged with metallic blue. Upper half of iris
metallic green, lower half black. Pectorals transparent. Other fins dusky
grey, frequently with a bluish sheen. Dorsal, anal, and caudal with small
fawn spots and bright bleu edges. In preserved specimens the body colour
tends to become grey or whitish.
OCCURRENCE AND BEHAVIOR
Within an examined coastal strip of about 80 km in total length the
occurrence of the new Julidochromis was limited to a few kilometres of rocky
shore between cape Kachese and cape Kamwankoko, i. E. north and south of the
mouth of the Mugela river.
It lives in shallow water, at depth of one to three meters.
Field observations with goggles, snorkel, and flippers proved that this
cichlid is fairly common in the described habitat. It is, however, difficult
to detect and even more difficult to catch, as it always moves in close
contact with the rocks and immediately withdraws under stones or into
crevices if disturbed. For the most part strictly territorial fish is
distributed in pairs over its habitat. The focal point of its territory is a
cave, on the roof of witch the eggs are deposited. It frequently lives side
by side with Julidochromis regani, although the latter species generally
prefers deeper water.
RELATIONSHIP
At present the genre Julidochromis is composed of two different
species-groups, witch differ both of them morphologically and ecologically
and constitute two different evolutionary lines. Both of them comprise two
closely related species. One of these species-groups is composed of
Julidochromis regani and J. marlieri, the other of J. ornatus and J.
transcriptus.
(… …)
Matthes (1962) points to the feat that the two forms of each species-group
might possibly be taken to represent only two subspecies, for a few
specimens were found, which seem to be intermediate forms between the two
members of cache of the different lines.
In the present state of our knowledge it seems rather difficult to give the
new form a satisfactory classification within the Genus Julidochromis. Apart
from its body and its caudal peduncle, which seem to be more elongated,
there are on the basis of morphologic features no real grounds to justify
recognition as a distinct species, for it is more or less identical with
both J. ornatus and J. transcriptus.
It shown to be distinct, however, by its coloration and by features of its
ecology. J. ornatus and J. transcriptus generally live in the intermediate
zone between the rocky and the sandy shore, while J. regani and J. marlieri
prefer a rocky biotop (cf. Matthes 1962). The tact that J. dickfeldi was
only found in a rocky habitat, in which it frequently co-existed with J.
regani, seems to indicate that this species occupies an ecological niche,
differing from that of the other two members of its species-group. In the
present state of our knowledge we, therefore, think it best not to consider
the three forms of this line conspecific, but to maintain the hitherto
existing classification by distinguishing J. ornatus and J. transcriptus
specifically and adding the new form as another species. It is named after
all dickfeldi, whose idea it was to undertake the expedition to Zambia.
(… …)
BACK to the French or translated
version.
|